Title: The Culture of Critique
In The Culture of Critique, evolutionary psychologist Kevin MacDonald, Ph.D. provides an evolutionary analysis of Jewish involvement in 20th century intellectual and political movements and activities that have had extensive impact on European nations. This book is a long, detailed and extensively referenced read and you will need at least a college level reading ability to get through it. If you can read it, you should read it, most especially if you are a non-Jew of native European extraction.
Also, if you have not read The Culture of Critique, you are NOT qualified to comment on its contents. I will not debate or engage in any discussion about the central claim of the book – that Jewish intellectuals and politicians have for many, many years into recent times deliberately engaged in activities aimed at weakening the fabric of European Gentile families and nations – with anyone who has not read or refuses to read this book. If you haven't read it you are not informed.
The Culture of Critique is not about the activities of all Jews or rank-and-file Jews. Its not a polemic or call to action. It is an evolutionary analysis of the behavior of Jewish religious leaders, intellectuals and politiicians and the Jewish tribe and the impact of this behavior on European Gentile culture. The Culture of Critique provides historical evidence that Jewish intellectuals and politicians have a common way of thinking and acting, because it was the way of thinking and acting that made a Jew a leader among Jews, because it helped Jews survive and thrive by successfully competing for resources with Gentiles.
Leading Jews have learned that they can manipulate Europeans by perennially playing the victim card. They moan about historical persecution of Jews (often as if no other group has ever suffered persecution) and pretend that Jews have always been innocent of all wrong doing. Moreover, they also aver that any criticism of their very ethnocentric behavior or suggestion that their characteristic behaviors cause non-Jews to dislike them is highly irrational "antisemitism."
Europeans tend to fall for this because our traditional culture and habitat selected for (favored the reproduction of) individuals who had a sense of fairness and justice, and who were individualistic so predisposed to attribute undesirable behaviors as characteristic of individual Jews rather than stereotypically of most or all members of the Hebrew tribe.
Jewish intellectuals have also seem to have appointed themselves the ultimate moral, political, and economic authorities. In The Culture of Critique, MacDonald demonstrates that Jewish intellectuals and organizations including, to name a few, Sigmund Freud, Eric Fromm, Wilhelm Reich, Herman Marcuse, T.W. Adorno, Franz Boas, the Anti-Defamation League, the Southern Poverty Law Center, the American Civil Liberties Union, and others have relentlessly criticized Europeans and traditional European culture, sexual morality, art, religion and commitment to self-defense against tyranny (i.e. the Second Amendment), generally judging it pathological, with the apparent aim of undermining European morale, solidarity and self-determination.
According to the several of the aformentioned leading Jews, Gentile culture is more or less inherently sick or evil, and all Gentiles are just a hairsbreadth away from becoming mass murderers. Europeans must follow Jewish rules and religions (including Christianity), or give unlimited financial and military support to Israel, in order to redeem themselves. Gentiles must fall at the feet of these Jewish critics and obey all their dictates because, of course, Jews are intellectually and morally superior, and Europeans "owe" them for past wrongs.
In The Culture of Critique, MacDonald painstakingly shows in deep detail how in fact, the Jewish intellectuals have used their victim status, sense of intellectual and moral superiority, and relentless "critique" and "deconstruction" of European culture and values in order to disable Europeans, take command of European resources and get Europeans (including gentile Americans) to serve Jewish interests. Its a con game. Read this book to get wise to the their deception.
Like it or not, life involves competition for resources. This is the way Nature – the only GOD – made it.
MacDonald’s fundamental premise is that Jews have evolved a group strategy of commandeering the resources of non-Jews, particularly Europeans (the most productive of Gentiles), through intellectual and cultural subversion. Basically, Jewish intellectuals take control of cultural narratives to lead non-Jews into self-hatred, treason to their own Gentile communities, and submission to the desires of the Jews. Jews compete for resources by convincing non-Jews of Jewish intellectual and moral superiority, and conning non-Jews into accepting their (Jewish) ideologies as superior to non-Jewish ideologies.
In MacDonald’s Introduction to The Culture of Critique, he describes the diametrically different evolutionary origins of Jewish and European culture, summarized in the table below, from the first chapter of the book.
Basically, Jews evolved in circumstances which favored highly ethnocentric and xenophobic polygynous collectivists with an ingroup/outgroup morality, whereas Europeans evolved in a habitat that favored individuals who valued sexual restraint, monogamy, independent thinking and self-reliance along with a universalist morality.
Also, Judaism is highly dogmatic and values submission to in-group authority and charismatic leaders (e.g. rabbis, and, as MacDonald shows, charismatic intellectuals like Freud), whereas Europeans are fundamentally non-dogmatic pagans who value truth, evidence and reason over charismatic personality.
Jews also strongly believe they are special. MacDonald quotes the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, who in the following passage claims that Jews are physically and spiritually superior to non-Jews:
“We do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of…a totally different species…The body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world…The difference of the inner quality [of the body]…is so great that the bodies would be considered as completely different species. This is the reason why the Talmud states that there is an halachic difference in attitude about the bodies of non-Jews [as opposed to the bodies of Jews] ‘their bodies are in vain’…An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness.”
This exemplifies how leading Jews believe in the innate spiritual superiority of Jews, and transmit this belief to other Jews. I call this Jewish supremacism. Both religious and apparently secular Jews deeply believe that Jews are special and better than non-Jews.
Prominent Jewish rabbi Ovadia Yosef in 2010 claimed that non-Jews exist only to serve Jews.
MacDonald points out that since Jews believe they are absolutely superior to non-Jews, they also believe that morals are not universal. Jews do not have to follow the same rules as non-Jews because Jews are superior to non-Jews or "special" and "deserve" things that Gentiles do not deserve.
Thus, Jews are strong supporters of Israel as a supermajority Jewish nation, deeming a homogenous ethnostate proper for Jews, because they "deserve" it as a unique people, but demand diversity and multiculturalism for gentile nations. Apparently, Gentiles do not "deserve" homogenous nations because they are fundamentally inferior to Jews and because homogenous gentile nations are pathological, leading inevitably to anti-Semitism (i.e. resistance to manipulation by Jews) and mass murder.
In 2018 the Sephardic Chief Rabbi stated that non-Jews are by Jewish religious law forbidden to live in Israel except to serve the Jewish population.
A large part of The Culture of Critique is devoted to providing historical proof that Jews have played decisive roles in opposing the idea that the United States or any European nation should have supermajority European populations. What’s good for the Jew is not good for the Gentile, you see, because the Jews are so special, the divinely chosen people.
Evidence for this is not hard to find. In the video below, Barbara Spectre, a Jew, proclaims that Europe "must" become multi-cultural – i.e. non-European – to survive, and that Jews are playing a leading role in this transformation.
So there you have it: Europeans "must" accept multiculturalism – that is, allow Europe to become non-European – because the morally superior Jews say so. Non-Jews are forbidden to live in Israel, but Jews claim the right not only to live in but control the banking and borders of every other nation. Jews can throw non-Jews out of Israel if they want, but no-one can throw Jews out of any other nation. By their own rules, Jews rule, and if you question their wisdom or benevolence, you are a bigot, an anti-Semite, and "literally Hitler."
Why have so many Europeans have fallen at the feet of Jewish intellectuals (if they can be called such), and embraced their twisted bogus ideologies (Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, post-modernism, deconstructionism, cultural Marxism, sexual revolution, open borders, etc.) as if divinely inspired? I blame this largely on Christianity. Christianity conditioned Europeans to regard GOD as Jewish, Israel as the holy land, and the Bible, a book of monumental Jewish lies and immorality, as divinely inspired or even the literal word of GOD.
Critique of the Jews was not always politically incorrect. Thomas Paine heavily influenced some of the key founders of the U.S.A.. Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson professed Deism. Paine’s penetrating critiques of Judaism and Christianity led these men to include in the U.S. Constitution reference to GOD and The Creator but not to Christianity, and to append the First Amendment which forbids the U.S. Government from establishing any official church or creed.
“Could we permit ourselves to suppose that the Almighty would distinguish any nation of people by the name of his chosen people, we must suppose that people to have been an example to all the rest of the world of the purest piety and humanity, and not such a nation of ruffians and cut-throats as the ancient Jews were – a people who, corrupted by and copying after such monsters and imposters as Moses and Aaron, Joshua, Samuel, and David, had distinguished themselves above all others on the face of the known earth for barbarity and wickedness.
On what grounds did Paine accuse the Jews of addiction to deception, cruelty and revenge? Well, as Paine demonstrated, the Old Testament itself, claimed to record the history of the Jews, shows them to be so addicted. The New Testament is no better. If you don't believe Paine, read the Old Testament yourself. When I read The Age of Reason, I wondered why I was in 12 years of public school never assigned to read this book by one of the men most responsible for the founding of the U.S.A..
In Chapter 1 of The Culture of Critique, MacDonald discusses generally how Jews poisoned European intellectuals and society with their “radical critique” and “deconstructionism” strategies.
In Chapter 2 he shows how the Jewish anthropologist Franz Boas poisoned anthropology and the social sciences in general by fabricating stories about non-Western tribes, and using those stories to specifically to attack Gentile culture, particularly sexual morality, and by refusing to use evolutionary theory or natural science to explain obvious physical and behavioral differences between races and nations.
In Chapter 3 of The Culture of Critique, MacDonald thoroughly discusses the leading, central and undeniable roles that Jews – including Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky, Rosa Luxemburg, Emma Goldman, Ethel and Julius Rosenberg (convicted of spying on the U.S. for the Soviet Union), Abbie Hoffman, and others – have historically played in the rise, support and promotion of communism and other leftist political movements, including the Soviet Union, Eastern European, and U.S. communist activities and parties.
High-ranking Soviet Jews played key roles in the Ukrainian Holodomor and other Soviet programs that killed 50-60 million gentiles. I can understand why Jewish intellectuals don't really want anyone to talk about this because it makes a Jew's ideology – Marxism – and some Soviet Jews partly or wholly responsible for the deaths of 10 times more Gentiles than the number of Jews claimed to have been killed by Germans during WWII. In other words it deprives them of their "always victim, never oppressor" card.
This is likely why the largely Jew-controlled media [and entertainment industry ] has worked very diligently to get everyone to regard Hitler as the archetype of mass murder, and on the other hand to view the Jew Marx as a genius and socialism as a paradise as yet unrealized.
Just think about this: you've probably seen several if not dozens of movies on the
evils of Hitler, National Socialism and the Holocaust, but never one on
the evils of Marxist communism, Lenin, the Holodomor or the roles of high ranking Soviet Jews in the systematic extermination of anti-communists (those mostly being non-Jews). You've seen
or read a lot about the alleged diaries of Anne Frank, but probably not so much about Aleksandr
Solzhenitsyn, who was imprisoned in Soviet work camps for his political dissidence and in his book Two Hundred Years Together explicitly and correctly described the leading roles Jews played in the "revolutionary genocide and secret police purges of the Soviet Union."
Marxists not only killed 50-60 million non-Jews in Russia and the Ukraine, but also for another 35 million in China. That means that Marx and some other Jews were instrumental in the mass murder of 85-95 million non-Jews. Marxism is a wholly criminal doctrine based on theft (stealing from producers to fund non-producers), yet our colleges are full of leftist academics who still present it as the most moral of doctrines and the final solution to our problems of "oppression."
In Chapter 4, we learn how Freud, Fromm, Reich, Adorno and other Jewish psychoanalysts fabricated fanciful (and false) theories and
sometimes also falsified "data" with the explicit intent of portraying conservative European
sexual morality and healthy families as pathological. In this chapter MacDonald traces
the tortuous "logic" by which Adorno and the other Jewish authors of The Authoritarian Personality
attempted to portray healthy, intact European families and their successful children as pathologically "authoritarian." Meanwhile Adorno et al also used twisted logic to try to prove that people who clearly had mental suffering and poor performance capacities due to being brought up broken families were in fact healthy, strong and liberated. MacDonald makes a strong case for the conclusion that the authors of The Authoritarian Personality had a conscious aim to
demonize and undermine healthy European families, normalize familial dysfunction and consequently mental instability and illness in children,
and ultimately atomize European cultures so that there would exist no unified European
resistance to Jewish inflitration and agendas.
In Chapter 5 of The Culture of Critique, MacDonald documents the destructive work of the Frankfurt School of Social Research, which was led by Jewish intellectuals. The Frankfurt School is the source of Cultural Marxism, which through academia and the media largely succeeded in convincing many European people that sexual conservatism, stable families, strong fathers and individual allegiance to parents, kin, community and nation are all indicative of mental illness ("sexual repression") for Gentiles (but not for Jews).
In Chapter 7, MacDonald documents the role of Jews in shaping U.S. (and European) immigration policy. Up until 1965, the U.S. had very limited immigration, and policy favored the immigration of European Gentiles, aimed at keeping the U.S.A. a European nation. Jews called this “racist” and “xenophobic” and were instrumental in getting the 1965 Hart-Cellar act passed, opening the borders to anyone and everyone. Still today Jewish intellectuals, academics, media personalities and organizations lead the charge to keep the U.S. borders open to one and all immigrants, legal or illegal, while opposing deportation of illegals and enforcement of even the lax immigration laws. MacDonald shows that this serves Jewish interests, because they fear European cultural hegemony, but not the interests of Europeans who want to maintain a culturally homogenous United States, just as Jews want to maintain a Jewish Israel.
In so many words, MacDonald's book provides much evidence that, consciously or not, Jewish intellectuals and politicians have the goal of making non-Jews serve Jewish interests. European non-Jews need to be aware that Jews have this tendency to use their intellectual power to undermine European culture. We can then more rationally decide whether to believe, collaborate with or support the various ideologies, initiatives, and actions of Jewish intellectuals, politicians, and organizations. Identification and non-violent boycott of anti-European ideologies, initiatives and actions is all that is needed to deprive those of any power to undermine European people and their best interests.
In summary, if you want to understand modern U.S. and world politics, Hollywood, academia, the cultural revolution and "social sciences," you need to understand the principles of evolutionary sociobiology and the role of Jewish supremacism. The Culture of Critique will give you some of the knowledge you need.