Who Wants Open Borders?

Who wants open borders for the U.S. and Europe?  Why do they want open borders for the U.S. and Europe? 

This is a red pill article.  Read on to find out who wants open borders for the U.S. and Europe more than anyone else. 

In Politics Book 5 Part 3 Aristotle observed that "the reception of strangers [immigrants] in colonies, either at the time of their foundation or afterwards, has generally produced revolution" because strangers to a land do not have the same values as those of the established inhabitants.
"Another cause of revolution is difference of races which do not at once acquire a common spirit; for a state is not the growth of a day, any more than it grows out of a multitude brought together by accident. Hence the reception of strangers in colonies, either at the time of their foundation or afterwards, has generally produced revolution; for example, the Achaeans who joined the Troezenians in the foundation of Sybaris, becoming later the more numerous, expelled them; hence the curse fell upon Sybaris. At Thurii the Sybarites quarreled with their fellow-colonists; thinking that the land belonged to them, they wanted too much of it and were driven out. At Byzantium the new colonists were detected in a conspiracy, and were expelled by force of arms; the people of Antissa, who had received the Chian exiles, fought with them, and drove them out; and the Zancleans, after having received the Samians, were driven by them out of their own city. The citizens of Apollonia on the Euxine, after the introduction of a fresh body of colonists, had a revolution; the Syracusans, after the expulsion of their tyrants, having admitted strangers and mercenaries to the rights of citizenship, quarreled and came to blows; the people of Amphipolis, having received Chalcidian colonists, were nearly all expelled by them. "

What follows illustrates Aristotle's point that ethnic diversity – multiculturalism – generally leads to inter-ethnic conflict.

Unfortunately, common people advocating open borders do not realize that they are the useful idiots and pawns serving an ethnic group that has through its lobbies, money, and influence heavily influenced the U.S. government and made it serve a hostile foreign nation.

Many members of this ethnic group consider their tribe very special  – divinely chosen – and on the whole they are very loyal to the tribe and homeland; they are generally more loyal to their homeland than to the U.S.A. They are a so-called "international people" who wants open borders for all nations except their own. 

This tribe evolved in markedly different natural and cultural circumstances from those in which Europeans evolved.

From The Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald PhD

It is a basic principle of evolutionary biology that different environments (including different cultures) select for different characteristics.  As a result, this particular ethnic group has values and goals not shared by or beneficial to the Europeans who founded and built the U.S.A.

As evolutionary pyschologist Kevin MacDonald thoroughly documents in his book The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth Century Intellectual and Political Movements (which I reviewed here), it is an historical fact that prominent Jewish intellectuals and politicians were the primary promoters of so-called "immigration reform" that resulted in the passage of the 1965 Hart-Cellar act that dramatically changed U.S. immigration policy. 

Previous to 1965, U.S. immigration was limited in quantity and also favored northern and western Europeans, i.e. the same ethnic stock as the founders of this nation, to maintain the cultural identity of the nation.  Prominent Jewish intellectuals and politicians, particularly Jewish historian Oscar Handlin in so many words called this original U.S. immigration policy "racist."  Up to that time, the U.S. remained ~90% European (primarily Anglo-Saxon), a homogenous state.  The passage of this act resulted in a dramatic influx of non-Europeans from Latin America, Asia, Africa, and the Middle East.

Who wants open borders more than anyone else? 

The Jews. Their Rabbis and alphabet soup of lobbying groups (ADL, SPLC, etc.) call U.S. border patrol and control cruel and immoral, and want us to open our borders to any and all.

Click here to read article.

Click here to read article.

The talking heads (many from the tribe or getting a paycheck from a tribe-member) keep trying to convince us that "diversity is our strength," but the U.N. reports that all of the top 10 happiest nations are ethnically homogenous with strong social support networks.

The Boston Globe reports Ethnic diversity destroys social cohesion and support networks:

"IT HAS BECOME increasingly popular to speak of racial and ethnic diversity as a civic strength. From multicultural festivals to pronouncements from political leaders, the message is the same: our differences make us stronger.

"But a massive new study, based on detailed interviews of nearly 30,000 people across America, has concluded just the opposite. Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam -- famous for "Bowling Alone," his 2000 book on declining civic engagement -- has found that the greater the diversity in a community, the fewer people vote and the less they volunteer, the less they give to charity and work on community projects. In the most diverse communities, neighbors trust one another about half as much as they do in the most homogenous settings. The study, the largest ever on civic engagement in America, found that virtually all measures of civic health are lower in more diverse settings."

This is not really news.  As I showed above, Aristotle knew this 2300 years ago.  All tyrants have known this dictum:  "divide and conquer."  Ethnic diversity is ethnic division, which makes a nation non-cohesive and weak.  This is evolved biology and psychology, not ideology.  Birds of a feather flock together.  Like attracts like.  People who have markedly different values, diets, lifestyles, religions, etc. just don't get along as well as people who share values, diets, lifestyles etc..  Its not rocket science.  We understand that two individuals can be incompatible due to their differences; why do we deny that two cultures can be incompatible due to their differences?

"Diversity is our strength."  The people who want open borders most also control the major media companies.  They have their talking heads repeat the lie over and over. 

Repeating a lie over and over will not make it true, but it might deceive people long enough to get them to accept something they should reject.  

Jews know that ethnic diversity will not make Israel strong.  They don't want open borders for their homeland.  Israel practices extreme border control to keep their nation Jewish (ethnically homogenous):

Who Wants Open Borders For Israel?

Not Jews.  The Israeli border patrol will kill Palestinians, including children, who protest at the Gaza border

"Israeli forces shot and killed two Palestinians, one of them a 14-year-old boy, and wounded 415 others with live fire and tear gas during protests along the Gaza border on Friday, Gaza health officials said....

"Gaza officials say Israeli troops have killed at least 135 people since the weekly protests began on March 30.

"Palestinians say the protests are a popular outpouring of rage against Israel by refugees demanding the right to return to homes their families fled or were driven from on Israel’s founding 70 years ago."

These Palestinians are trying to return to the homes Israel took from them within the last 70 years.  None of the people trying to cross the southern U.S. border have been forced from their homes by U.S. invasion and occupation. When was the last time U.S. border agents use live fire and tear gas at the southern border?  When did U.S. border agents kill 135 people and wound 415 others at the southern U.S. border?  This tribe KILLS and MAIMS children to keep displaced Palestinians from crossing their homeland borders, yet according to their Rabbis and lobbies, it is U.S. border policy, requiring a legal procedure – i.e. the rule of law – for passage, that is "cruel" and "unethical" and most important to protest.

According to leading teachers of their very racial religious ideology, people who don't belong to their tribe and religion should not be allowed on that land, except to serve Jews.  In America they keep telling us that diversity is our strength, but in Israel they adhere to the truth: homogeneity creates strength and diversity creates division.

Apparently they want to keep that land for themselves, very separate from others, but they want no other tribe to keep a homogeneous nation for itself.  An ethnically pure Jewish nation is good and moral, and must be preserved at all costs, but an ethnically homogenous European nation is "racist," "anti-Semitic," bad and immoral.  Monocultural Israel for the Jews, multicultural nations for the Gentiles.

Who wants open borders for Europe more than anyone else?  The Jews. Europe "must" become multicultural "or it will not survive" according to Jewish intellectual Barbara Spectre.

The question is, when she says Europe must become multicultural or it will not survive, is that a prediction or a threatIsrael never signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, and has been stealing nuclear secrets and materials and making nuclear weapons since the 1950s.  
"Experts generally assess the country as currently having approximately eighty nuclear weapons, fewer than countries such as France, China and the United Kingdom, but still a sizeable number considering its adversaries have none. These weapons are spread out among Israel’s version of a nuclear “triad” of land-, air- and sea-based forces scattered in a way that they deter surprise nuclear attack."  -  Iran Fears Israel for One Reason: Nuclear Weapons
What they deem good for themselves, they deem immoral for others. This is, of course, a double-standard.

According to the Huffington Post, Naftali Bennett, Israel's economy minister, said in 2013 that he doesn't see any problem with killing "lots of Arabs."


In 2018 Bennett defended Israeli soldiers who filmed their shooting of an unarmed Palestinian, after which the Israelis cheered.


Their Defense minister Avigdor Lieberman says there are no innocents in Gaza, and that the Israeli sniper who shot the unarmed Palestinian deserves a medal.



According to the BBC report above, Israeli Arab MP Ayman Odeh said in a tweet that the video "horrifies the mind". "Calls of joy at taking a life and what appears to be the execution of someone who did not threaten anyone," he added.

But the Defense minister Lieberman believes that disloyal Israeli Arabs (like Odeh?) should be beheaded.


On the whole this tribe doesn't want U.S. Gentiles to have the ability to get guns to defend themselves from tyranny, just like it doesn't want Israel's neighbors to have weapons comparable to Israel. 

Who Wants Gun Control Most? Click to read.
"Americans in general may be divided about gun control, but Jewish Americans are not. They have always been among the most enthusiastic advocates of legislation that will regulate gun ownership in a reasonable way. At the Million Mom March a dozen years ago, the largest gun-control demonstration in American history, Jews attended in droves.

"This is because most Jews are still Democrats, and gun control is more of a Democrat issue than a Republican one; this is because Jews are an overwhelmingly urban people who lack a culture of hunting and gun ownership; and this is because the NRA is associated in the minds of many Jews with extremist positions that frighten Jews and from which they instinctively recoil."  – US Jews Support Gun Control, Haaretz
So "...the NRA is associated in the minds of many Jews with extremist positions that frighten Jews...."  Israel has extreme gun control laws, so that only people "approved" by the Israeli government can have guns.  Arabs are not among those "approved."  So, Palestinians are disarmed; only Israelis (mostly police and soldiers) have guns.  In self-defense Palestinians might throw rocks, and Israelis who have guns will put them in jail for up to 20 years.


Apparently the Chosen People are fine with the Israeli government monopolizing lethal force.   Maybe Israelis don't have "extremist positions that frighten Jews" but as shown above some Israelis like Yosef, Bennett and Lieberman have positions that very likely frighten Arabs and should frighten all Gentiles.

Through their lobby group, the the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), these people are the main U.S. advocates of censoring Gentile speech.  Specifically, they want to control "hate speech." Here's an ADL video describing how they are engaged in creating artificial intelligence to identify "hate speech" in social media so that they can "address the problem." 

South Carolina has passed a law defining anti-Semitism, but there is no law anywhere defining anti-Europeanism.


 "The bill uses as its template the State Department definition of anti-Semitism, which includes as anti-Semitic calls for violence against Jews, advancing conspiracy theories about Jewish control and Holocaust denial. More controversially, it also includes “applying double standards” to Israel “by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.”

"Critics of the effort to advance that language in Congress and in a number of other state legislatures say it is too broad and could encompass conventional criticism of Israel. The State Department language was never intended as an enforcement tool and was drafted as a means of advising diplomats how to assess whether anti-Semitism is prevalent in countries where they serve."
This law looks like the first step towards attempting to make it outright illegal and punishable to criticize the actions or question the motives of members of the Hebrew tribe.  The most ironic aspect of this legal definition of anti-Semitism is its specification that applying double standards to Israel constitutes anti-Semitism.  Given that, as shown above, prominent members of this tribe frequently apply a double-standard to all European nations, deeming it immoral for a Gentile nation to do what they deem moral for Israel, by logical deduction one would conclude that prominent members of this tribe are frequently guilty of anti-Europeanism. 

The idea that anyone advancing a "conspiracy theory" to account for the actions of any powerful group is "crazy" and illegitimate is itself a way to try to shame or scare people away from questioning the actions of powerful people.  If you genuinely believe that powerful people never conspire to achieve their aims, you are pretty naive.  George Carlin had some pertinent sarcastic remarks about this: 

If some claimed historical event is supported by overwhelming evidence, why do we need laws to shame or prohibit questioning or denying that event?  You could just trot out the evidence – by that I mean real evidence, not some Hollywood movie produced by members of the tribe in question – and show that the questioners are idiots.  The truth fears no question or investigation.  To a critical thinker, shaming or sending people to jail for questioning some alleged historical event – instead of producing hard evidence and ignoring the deniers – arouses suspicion that the "history" and the hard evidence may not match.  Do we make it a crime to question or deny the claim that the earth is a globe?

QUESTION EVERYTHING.  This is a basic principle of truth-seeking, a basic principle of native European philosophy.  When someone doesn't want something questioned, it arouses suspicion.

History is written by the victors, and experience has shown that they often lie.  That's why the Founding Fathers of the U.S. held Free Speech sacred.  Many Jews claim the Old Testament is a history of their tribe.  That book claims that a supernatural entity granted them inviolable claim to a particular territory.  In his book The Age of Reason Thomas Paine showed that the Old and New Testaments are both full of lies, inconsistencies, and chronological and geneological impossibilities, and the Old is full of claims that the Divine One not only gave permission but ordered the Jews to brutally massacre their enemies, assassinate infants and rape women. 

In Numbers xxxi 13 of the Bible Moses tells his soldiers 'kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known a man by lying with him; but all the women-children that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.'  Paine commented:
"Among the detestable villains that in any period of the world have disgraced the name of man, it is impossible to find a greater than Moses, if this account be true.  Here is an order to butcher the boys, to massacre the mothers, and debauch the daughters..."
"People in general know not what wickedness there is in this pretended word of God.  Brought up in habits of superstition, they take it for granted that the Bible is true, and that it is good; they permit themselves not to doubt of it, and they carry the ideas they form of the benevolence of the Almighty to the book which they have been taught to believe was written by his authority.  Good heavens! it is quite another thing, it is a book of lies, wickedness, and blasphemy; for what can be greater blasphemy, that to ascribe the wickedness of man to the orders of the Almighty!"
(Page 100, The Age of Reason)
 The Boycott, Divest and Sanction (BDS) movement aims to influence Israel's actions against Arabs by depriving it of economic resources.  BDS wants freedom, justice and equality for Palestinians in their homeland.  The ADL and Jews in general view the BDS movement as "anti-Semitic" and a threat to the existence of Israel.

Curiously, although the U.S. is allegedly not a subsidiary of Israel, twenty U.S. states have passed laws against boycotting, divesting from and sanctioning Israel.  The ADL recognizes that these laws are unconstitutional infringements of free speech, but it cares more about supporting Israel than about American civil liberties: "It has no intention of actually acting to oppose these bills...And it applauds the lawmakers sponsoring and supporting them. Moreover, it has no quarrel with other Jewish groups that push such measures." 


To illustrate the power of the Israeli lobby over U.S. politicians,  In 2017, forty-three (of 50) U.S. Senators wanted to make it a federal crime to boycott Israel.  Why are 86% of U.S. Senators so loyal to a foreign nation that they are willing to make it a crime for a U.S. citizen or corporation to boycott that nation in response to what they perceive as land theft and human rights abuses?  Can you imagine 86 percent of U.S. senators agreeing that it should be illegal for a U.S. citizen or corporation to boycott any other nation? 


They want no criticism of the Chosen Ones allowed. The truth of the accusations against them does not matter, they make their accusers criminals, as s/he is guilty of "anti-Semitism" for even suggesting that Jews or Israel might have done or plan to do something wrong.

Ironically, the Palestinians are a Semitic people, so the Israelis who hate and kill Palestinians are themselves anti-Semitic.

The Chosen People have already gotten the U.S. taxpayer to give Israel  at least $138 billion in military and other aid since 1949. 

Imagine what that $138 billion could have done for the U.S.A. if we had kept it here rather than sending it there:  infrastructure, education, health care, social security. 

According to Forbes, Israel gets more aid from the U.S. than any other nation, more than twice as much as any other nation. 


And that's not counting the indirect aid they get from us when we invade or assault, destabilize and divide their enemies (Lebanon, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Jordan, Iran) which occupy land that they claim belongs to them (because in Genesis 15:18-21 of their Bible it says their god gave it to them!).

Wikipedia explains that this definition of Israel:
"describes a large territory, "from the brook of Egypt to the Euphrates", comprising all of modern-day Israel, the Palestinian Territories, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Iraq, as well as Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, U.A.E, Oman, Yemen, most of Turkey, and all the land east of the Nile river."
Obviously they'll need to do some serious conquering to grab all of this land for themselves. Perhaps this explains why the Israelis frequently accuse the leaders of these nations of heinous crimes (attacking the people), and why the U.S. has invaded, assaulted, and destabilized several of these nations at Israel's request. 

This tribe has made a lot of money in banking; their holy book's "laws" allow them to make money by loaning money to Gentiles at interest (but they are not to loan to their brothers at interest)
"Thou shalt not lend upon interest to thy brother: interest of money, interest of victuals, interest of anything that is lent upon interest. Unto a foreigner thou mayest lend upon interest; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon interest; that the Lord thy God may bless thee in all that thou puttest thy hand unto…" (Deut. 23:20–21). https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/usury
They are pretty serious about this law: 

 Most of the founders of the U.S. Federal Reserve, the private bank that lends money to the U.S. government and controls the U.S. money supply, were members of this tribe.

Members of this tribe have controlled the U.S. money supply for three decades in a row.  This has given them control over not only the U.S. but the world economy.  Members of the tribe aren't shy about boasting how much power this gives them.

"Yellen’s ascent to the post will also guarantee that, by the end of her first term, Jews will have occupied the Fed’s top post for three decades straight – an unprecedented run of Jewish power and influence. The chairman’s seat hasn’t been occupied by a non-Jew since 1987, when Alan Greenspan was appointed by President Ronald Reagan to follow Paul Volcker. With the succession of Ben Bernanke in 2006, under President George W. Bush, and now the appointment of Yellen by President Barack Obama, it’s worth remembering that there is a concept in Jewish thought called chazakah: When something happens three times, it can be considered permanent. Applied to the Federal Reserve, it would suggest an impossibly firm grasp on a degree of power the likes of which the Jewish people have never known..."
"And yet, despite this historic Jewish run, anti-Semitic conspiracies about Jewish control of the world banking system seem, if anything, less common than they once were—all the more surprising because the degree of influence American central bankers have in the global financial system today surpasses anything the Rothschild tycoons were able to maintain at the height of their influence. Every time the Federal Reserve issues its thoughts about the future of the American economy, or tweaks an interest rate by a fraction of a percent, or adjusts its bond-buying program, it immediately alters trillions of dollars’ worth of transactions all around the globe. There are subsistence rice farmers in rural China who are affected by the Fed’s decisions along with Wall Street traders."

In fact, of 14 chairs of the Federal Reserve, 7 have been Jews, an over-representation of 2500%. Also, Jews are over-represented on the Federal Reserve Board of Governors by a factor of 28.5 times (2,850 percent), and over-represented among the Federal Reserve District Bank presidents by a factor of 16.5 times(1,650 percent).

As extensively documented in The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth Century Intellectual and Political Movements by evolutionary psychologist Kevin MacDonald (which I reviewed here):  Jews prefer foreigners to U.S. citizens or immigrants of European stock because they think making the U.S. (and Europe) "multicultural" – i.e. balkanized – protects them from being persecuted or excluded from the U.S. (or Europe) as they were from so many nations in the past (gotta wonder why) and also gives them political leverage against the group they fear the most: people of European descent.  They know that non-European nationals are more likely to vote for and support their party of choice (Democrat)

They want to bring non-European nationals in and drive people of European stock out, or reduce Europeans to a minority in the U.S. (and Europe), because Europeans generally have what Aristotle identified (in the quote opening this post) as a spirit of dignity and independence, and value both freedom of speech and the right to bear arms, both of which frighten Jews (and apparently other non-Europeans).  It looks like they don't like free speech because it allows Gentiles to openly criticize and question Jews and Israel and their stories ("anti-Semitism"), and they're afraid of Gentiles having guns with which they could carry out an armed revolt against tyrants. 

"Another mark of a tyrant is that he likes foreigners better than citizens, and lives with them and invites them to his table; for the one [citizens] are enemies, but the Others enter into no rivalry with him." 
Aristotle, Politics, Book 5, Part XI

', status : true, // check login status cookie : true, // enable cookies to allow the server to access the session xfbml : true, // parse XFBML channelUrl : 'http://www.fullrangestrength.com/fb/channel.html', // Custom Channel URL version: 'v3.1', oauth : true //enables OAuth 2.0 }); }; SS_PARAMS.ssFBLang = 'en_US';